ohmproject.png
Home
UK To Increase Copyright Penalty Tenfold

The Government and the Intellectual Property Office (UK-IPO) are consulting on the plans, which would allow Magistrates' Courts in England and Wales to issue summary fines of £50,000 for online copyright infringement.

The larger fine is proposed for commercial scale infringements, where the person involved profits from the infringement.

More...

 
RIAA Forced to Pay $107,951

The RIAA has been forced to pay more than $100,000 in attorneys' fees for Tanya Anderson, a single mother they sued for copyright infringement:

Single mum Tanya Andersen and her daughter, Kylee, have come to epitomize the victims of the Big 4’s RIAA as the labels continue to pursue their hopeless course of trying to sue consumers around the world into buying their formulaic, cookie-cutter ‘product’.

She and her lawyers, Lory Lybeck and Ben Justus, beat the labels and their enforcer to a standstill, and a judge ordered them to pay the price.

More...

 

 
Why Is Bush Increasing Spy Powers NOW?
Sunday, 17 August 2008

The Washington Post  reports today:

The Justice Department has proposed a new domestic spying measure that would make it easier for state and local police to collect intelligence about Americans, share the sensitive data with federal agencies and retain it for at least 10 years.

The proposed changes would revise the federal government's rules for police intelligence-gathering for the first time since 1993 and would apply to any of the nation's 18,000 state and local police agencies that receive roughly $1.6 billion each year in federal grants.

"So what else is new?" you may ask.  After all, the Bush Administration's attack on civil liberties and privacy has been unrelenting since they day took office.

But the next part of the report is what caught my attention:

Quietly unveiled late last month, the proposal is part of a flurry of domestic intelligence changes issued and planned by the Bush administration in its waning months. They include a recent executive order that guides the reorganization of federal spy agencies and a pending Justice Department overhaul of FBI procedures for gathering intelligence and investigating terrorism cases within U.S. borders.

Taken together, critics in Congress and elsewhere say, the moves are intended to lock in policies for Bush's successor and to enshrine controversial post-Sept. 11 approaches that some say have fed the greatest expansion of executive authority since the Watergate era.

Why would a lame-duck administration expand spy powers in its waning days if it expects a Democrat to take the White House in November? 

Read more...
 
Skype Has Back Door for Cops' Eavesdropping
Sunday, 27 July 2008

European news sources are picking up confirmation of a long-rumored "back door" in Skype that allows police agencies worldwide to listen in on conversations.  Heise Online and Austrian broadcaster ORF both report sources confirm the existence of the Skype back door after attending a late-June meeting in Austria among interior ministry officials (the state police), ISPs, justice ministry lawyers and regulatory experts.

The main purpose of the meeting was to pressure Austrian ISPs to allow the Austrian police to install network bridges and their own computers in ISP datacenters so that they could easily listen in on Internet traffic and even copy it.  During this gathering, Skype was mentioned as one Internet communication which already presented no challenge to police eavesdroppers.

Based on these discussions, it was unclear whether Skype was providing information to authorities about a backdoor or giving them a key to decypher communications.  There have even been reports that Skype sells such access to government agencies.

Skype tells its customers that their conversations are encrypted and secure.  Skype, owned by eBay/PayPal, declined to comment through its official spokeman.

The  agenda of the Austrian meeting is quite revealing about the progress of the modern police state concept that now stretches from the Great Firewall of China to the U. S. where telecoms were just granted immunity from civil liability for similar "cooperation," to Europe where the police in Sweden , Germany , and Denmark are enjoying greatly increased power to snoop.

Austrian police wanted the ISPs not only to install and connect their surveillance hardware but also insisted that customers be given static IP addresses to make them easier to track.  A few ISPs apparently objected to these plans, but two admitted that they were already providing the police with what they wanted.  Even the interior ministry officials admitted that it would now be difficult to get legislation through the Austrian parliament mandating ISP cooperation:

The reason given for not updating the legislation right away was that, in view of the present absence of terrorist activity, it would not currently be possible to mobilise political support for such a move. (Remember PNAC, anyone?)

Skype's backdoor is reminiscent of antivirus software maker McAfee's post-911 offer to put a backdoor in its customers' software to let in the FBI's "Magic Lantern" trojan.  In another similar revelation, a whistleblower reported earlier in the year that Verizon had provided the FBI with a backdoor to its customers' cellular records.  New York's Democratic Attorney General Andrew Cuomo recently scored a "success" by pressuring ISPs to shut down a large portion of UseNet because child pornography had been found a a relatively small percentage of the sites.

One irony about all this surveillance was a topic of discussion at the Austrian meeting.  The Austrian police admitted that using encrypted communications methods like true VPN would thwart their efforts:

The officials are reported to have made clear that they were well aware that their monitoring plans would only catch the more gauche end of the criminal spectrum. Professionally organised criminals would utilise encryption algorithms that would not allow easy decryption.

It makes one wonder about the real purpose of all this surveillance if even the eavesdroppers realize that it's easy to evade.

 
"Have You Stopped Beating the Consumer?"
Friday, 18 July 2008

Yesterday's hearings before Rep. Ed Markey's (D-MA) House Subcommittee on Telecommunications and the Internet reminded those concerned about Internet privacy and free speech that there are a number of clear and present dangers coming from  several different sources, both private and public.

At one point, the CEO of NebuAd, a company that wants to get to know you better through "deep packet inspection" of your Internet traffic, objected to one of Chairman Markey's questions, claiming that it was the equivalent of "Have you stopped beating your wife recently?"

Markey countered:

No, no, no, it's 'Have you stopped beating the consumer?' is the question.

Read more...
 
More...
<< Start < Prev 1 2 3 4 5 Next > End >>

Results 1 - 4 of 18
Copyright © 2008 The Ohm Project. Site Design by Nova Creative Studios